Educational Programme Accreditation
One named training programme, examined end to end: curriculum and contact hours, supervised clinical practice, faculty registration, assessment of competence, ethics and graduate outcomes.
Who this is for
Training providers whose applicants compare one course with another, and whose graduates need the training recognised beyond the school that gave it.
- Review fee
- $490 per programme
- Evidence portfolio
- 8 sections
- Normal decision
- 10 working days
- Certificate validity
- 12 months
Claims are checked against documents and public records
One published standard in every country
Every awarded accreditation has a checkable number
Documents required
Listed before the fee, so you can confirm that the required evidence is available before paying.
What is required
Only 3 documents. Everything below is optional, and a submission is complete without it.
-
Incorporation or registration document The document that evidences the registration number above. PDF or image · up to 12.0 MB
-
Full curriculum or programme handbook The document a prospective student would be given. This is read in full by the reviewer. PDF or Word · up to 12.0 MB
-
Diplomas and qualification certificates of the teaching staff At least the programme lead and the lead clinical supervisor. Attach as many as you wish; a scan or a photograph is enough. PDF, image, Word or ZIP · up to 12.0 MB
Helpful, but not required 10 documents
A submission is complete without these. Each one gives the reviewer something to credit rather than something to assume.
- Core reading list
- Faculty appointment and development policy
- Assessment appeals procedure
- Student handbook
- Code of ethics or ethical framework
- Safeguarding and client-risk policy
- Client and student complaints procedure
- Certificate of insurance
- Specimen of the diploma or certificate graduates receive
- Most recent student satisfaction survey
Where a public record exists, the submission asks for its link instead of a copy. Sections can be saved before they are complete.
Applicant details
The fee
The submission
Review and decision
The institution
We start with who the awarding body is. Everything here is checked against public records before a reviewer is assigned.
- The institution
- The programme
- The named contact